| |
Jan 3, 2013 Design Alternatives Unveiled

Highlights from Commission on Chicago Landmarks Meeting Nov 1, 2012
Photos
Testimony
Philip Enquist
Madeline Gelis
Gene Honda
Ronald Johnson
Allan Mellis
Jim Peters
Laurie Peterson
Winners 2012 Chicago Prize Competition: Future Prentice
April 2011
LI Reuse Study

New Website
Chicago Modern: More Than Mies





|
|
Prentice Women’s
Hospital
333 E. Superior St., Chicago
(Cook County)
Update
February 14, 2013
Today Landmarks Illinois and the
National Trust for Historic Preservation moved to
voluntarily dismiss their legal complaint in Cook County
Circuit Court, signaling the end of our legal challenge
against the City of Chicago and the Commission on
Chicago Landmarks with regard to Prentice Women’s
Hospital. At this time, we feel that the landmarks
process has run its course.
Although the outcome was not what supporters of
preserving Prentice for adaptive reuse had hoped,
Landmarks Illinois believes that it pursued all options
to find a solution and uphold the public process.
February 7, 2013
The Coalition to Save Prentice issued the following
statement:
We are disappointed that the Commission on Chicago
Landmarks voted to again reject its unanimous
preliminary landmark recommendation for Prentice. By the
standard of Chicago’s Landmarks Ordinance, the
Commission made its decision based on improper
considerations in an improper forum.
Since the Commission last voted on Prentice, healthcare
planning and design experts spent over 1,000 hours
developing a multitude of practical reuse possibilities
for Prentice. Each of these proposals meets
Northwestern’s needs while delivering greater economic
benefit–including an additional 1,560 jobs and $1.1
million in annual tax revenue. Today, the Commission
regrettably turned a blind eye to real solutions for
Chicago by ignoring the many viable options for reusing
Prentice.
See Press Coverage for
the latest news.
January 27, 2013
Prentice is headed to the Landmarks
Commission again. The City is acknowledging that the
Commission's November 1 meeting was deficient, but the
upcoming meeting and proposed rejection of landmark
recommendation for Prentice violate the Landmarks
Ordinance.
Click to read the full statement from the Save Prentice
Coalition. See Press Coverage for latest news
stories
January 11, 2013
Today, Judge Neil Cohen ruled to grant the City of Chicago’s motion to dismiss the National Trust for Historic Preservation and Landmarks Illinois lawsuit against the Commission on Chicago Landmarks and the City of Chicago because he had no legal standing to deny it. He gave the plaintiffs thirty additional days to appeal or reposition its case and continued the injunction until February 15.
The Save Prentice Coalition issued the following statement in response to today’s ruling by Judge Neil Cohen.
“We welcome the outcome of today’s hearing, which keeps in place a stay preventing harm to historic Prentice Women’s Hospital and provides an opportunity to amend our pleadings within 30 days. We appreciate the care with which Judge Cohen is considering this case.
“The City does not dispute that Prentice is architecturally worthy of landmark status. Indeed, the Landmarks Commission made a unanimous finding to that effect before rescinding the designation in a pre-orchestrated hearing. In court today, Judge Cohen called that process into question and noted that the public notice and swiftness of the proceedings were ‘arbitrary’ and ‘nontransparent.’ We agree.
“Despite Northwestern’s refusal to consider other options, a series of recent proposals shows that reusing Prentice would advance Chicago’s economy and its leadership in biomedical research. On January 3, a group of former City officials, experts and architects unveiled a series of reuse alternatives for Prentice. Reusing Prentice as a support facility for adjacent medical research would deliver significantly greater economic benefits than Northwestern’s current proposal – including an additional 600 temporary jobs, 980 permanent jobs and $1.1 million in annual tax revenues. These reuse alternatives and economic figures can be viewed and considered at
saveprentice2013.wordpress.com.
November 15, 2012
At an emergency hearing in Cook County Circuit Court on
Thursday, November 15, Judge Neil Cohen entered a stay
that restores the Commission on Chicago Landmarks’
preliminary landmark recommendation for historic
Prentice Women’s Hospital and temporarily bars the city
from issuing a demolition permit. The Commission
unanimously voted two weeks ago to grant a preliminary
landmark designation for Prentice and then--in an
unprecedented move--rescinded that designation just two
hours later at the same meeting based on a departmental
report.
On November 15, the National Trust for Historic
Preservation, joined by Landmarks Illinois, filed a
lawsuit against the Commission on Chicago Landmarks and
the City of Chicago. The suit argues that the Commission
unlawfully rescinded the designation in violation of
Chicago's Landmarks Ordinance by improperly weighing
alleged economic arguments and by usurping the authority
of City Council. Judge Cohen set the next court date for
December 7 and made it clear that he wanted to see
Prentice protected in the interim.
November 1, 2012
The
Commission on Chicago Landmarks (CCL) voted “yes” for a
recommendation of preliminary landmark designation for
Prentice Women’s Hospital, on November 1, 2012.
Shortly after, the commission rescinded the vote and
Prentice can now be demolished.
Over 100 Save Prentice supporters showed up at the
commission meeting proudly wearing Save Prentice tees
and buttons. They shared stories, expertise, and passion
about Bertrand Goldberg and his iconic Prentice Women's
Hospital. Many more followed the proceeding on Facebook
and Twitter, helping spread the word about this
important moment with likes, shares, and retweets.
With a unanimous 9-0 vote, the Commission recognized
Prentice with preliminary designation. However, all but
one Commissioner voted to overturn their landmark
recommendation less than three hours later. We applaud
Commissioner Christopher Reed for his dissenting vote, a
true demonstration of courage and independence.
The Save Prentice Coalition is considering all options
in response to yesterday's proceedings, and we will keep
you updated on this page, our “Ten
Most Endangered” Prentice page,
Save Prentice Facebook,
and on Twitter at @SavePrentice. Thanks again for all of
your support.
For more, read Landmarks Illinois’ Advocacy Director
Lisa DiChiera’s
statement delivered at a November 1
press event with the Save Prentice Coalition, prior to
the CCL meeting.
Prentice Women’s
Hospital
333 E. Superior St., Chicago
(Cook County)
This Bertrand Goldberg-designed building has been vacant
since September, 2011. Ownership has reverted from
Northwestern Memorial Hospital to Northwestern
University, which wants to demolish it and land bank the
property until it can finance a new medical research
facility. This concrete, clover leaf-shaped structure,
which was built in 1975, is representative of Goldberg’s
organic architectural designs and is highly adaptable
for reuse due to an open floor-plate structural system.
After Prentice was included on last year’s endangered
list Landmarks Illinois commissioned studies of three
possible reuses for the building. The University,
however, has claimed none are feasible for its needs.
Prentice was considered groundbreaking for its
cutting-edge architecture, advanced engineering and its
progressive design approach to organizing medical
departments and services. It received international
press coverage and an award from Engineering News
Record for its innovative tower and open floor-plate
layout that eliminated the need for structural support
columns. “You will not find the structural solution to
Prentice, which is an exterior shell cantilevered off a
core, anywhere else in the world” notes Geoffrey
Goldberg, an architect and Bertrand Goldberg’s son.
“Prentice was the only one in which this was achieved.”
When Northwestern Memorial Hospital first announced its
plans to build a new Prentice Women’s Hospital
preservation organizations immediately began voicing
concern about the future of the Goldberg-designed
building. Prentice was on Landmarks Illinois’ 2005-06
Chicagoland Watch List and this is its fourth
listing on the statewide endangered list. Preservation
Chicago has also included it on its Chicago 7
list for a second time this year. The National Trust for
Historic Preservation placed it on its nationwide “11
Most Endangered Historic Places” list. In 2010 the
Illinois Historic Preservation Agency determined the
building is eligible for listing in the National
Register of Historic Places.
In partnership with Preservation Chicago, DoCoMoMo
(Documentation and Conservation of the Modern Movement),
AIA Chicago,
and the National Trust for Historic Preservation, a
coalition has been formed to advocate for the
preservation of this irreplaceable Modern building.
Public Pressure to Save Prentice Growing
The
preservation of Prentice Hospital was a hot topic in the
news on July 26 and July 27, 2012. Numerous articles in
major print and radio media are covering the urging of
Mayor Rahm Emanuel by the design community to save
Prentice Hospital and are
linked below.
On July 26 the Save Prentice Coalition issued a letter
containing signatures from over 60 architects from
Chicago and abroad urging Mayor Emanuel to provide
protection for Bertrand Goldberg’s Prentice Hospital.
Since the fight to save Mies van der Rohe’s Farnsworth
House, this is the largest outpouring of support from
within the architecture community for saving an historic
building. Such a
letter is unprecedented.
On July 27, the Chicago Sun-Times
endorsed the preservation of historic Prentice
Hospital and urged that the building be placed back on
the agenda of the Commission for Chicago Landmarks for
its consideration of landmark designation.
The Chicago Tribune also published on July 27 an Op Ed
co-authored by Landmarks Illinois’ own president Bonnie
McDonald and Zurich Esposito, executive director of the
American Institute of Architects (AIA) Chicago.
Read the
points made for why this unique design should be a
Chicago landmark and our urging for a collaborative
reuse effort.
On
August 2, the Save Prentice Coalition delivered a professionally
prepared landmark nomination for Prentice to the Commission on
Chicago Landmarks, but was told that the topic of Prentice would not
be discussed, as the administration is still having discussions with
all parties.
Click here to read a summary of the meeting and
here to
read the statement and
here to review the nomination.
On September
6th at the Commission on Chicago Landmarks meeting,
Chairman Rafael Leon announced that while discussion
about Prentice would not be permitted that day, Prentice
would be on the agenda of one of the upcoming fall
meetings. In the meantime, the Save Prentice Coalition
continues to collect signatures from leading architects
in Chicago and the world, including eight Pritzker Prize
winners, on a letter to Mayor Rahm Emanuel in support of
landmarking Prentice.
Over 80 Architects sign letter to the Mayor in support
of Prentice.pdf .
What You Can Do
Write a letter to city officials in support of reuse of the building.
Or,
send an email message to Mayor Emanuel and the Commission on Chicago Landmarks in support of landmarking Prentice and in support of finding a reuse for this irreplaceable building.
|
•
|
Mayor
Rahm Emanuel
Office of the Mayor
City Hall
City of Chicago
121 N. LaSalle St.
Chicago, IL 60602
mayor.emanuel@cityofchicago.org |
|
• |
Chairman Rafael M. Leon
Commission on Chicago Landmarks
33 N. LaSalle Street
Suite 1600
Chicago IL, 60602 |
|
• |
Alderman Brendan Reilly
Office of the 42nd Ward
325 W. Huron, Suite 510
Chicago IL, 60654
Ph 312.642.4242
Fax 312.642.0420
office@ward42chicago.com |
|
• |
Join the Save Prentice Facebook page at
SavePrentice.org. |
Additional Links
Letters
of Support
Press
Coverage
|
 |
Chicago Tribune, April 11, 2013
|
|
 |
Chicago Tribune, February 15, 2013
|
|
 |
ArchitectureChicago Plus, February 14, 2013
|
|
 |
Chicago Sun-Times, February 14, 2013
|
|
 |
Medill Reports Chicago, February 12, 2013
|
|
 |
Chicago Reader, February, 12, 2013
|
|
 |
ArchitectureChicago Plus, February 7, 2013
|
|
 |
WBEZ, February 7, 2013
|
|
 |
DNIinfo Chicago, February 7, 2013
|
|
 |
Crain’s Chicago Business, February 7, 2013
|
|
 |
Reader, January 28, 2013
|
|
 |
Chicago Tribune, January 27, 2013
|
|
 |
ArchitecturePlus Chicago, January 27, 2013
|
|
 |
Reader, January 18, 2013
|
|
 |
Crain’s Chicago Business, January 11, 2013
|
|
 |
WBEZ, January 11, 2013
|
|
 |
Reader, January 11, 2013
|
|
 |
ArchitecturePlus Chicago, January 11, 2013
|
|
 |
DNAinfo Chicago, January 11, 2013
|
|
 |
Chicago Tribune, January 11, 2013
|
|
 |
WBEZ, January 4, 2013
|
|
 |
Chicago Tribune, January 3, 2013
|
|
 |
Chicago Sun-Times, January 3, 2013
|
|
 |
DNAinfo Chicago, January 3, 2013
|
|
 |
ArchitecturePlus Chicago, January 3, 2013
|
|
 |
Chicago Tribune, December 7, 2012
|
|
 |
Crain’s Chicago Business, December 6, 2012
|
|
 |
WBEZ, December 6, 2012
|
|
 |
Reader, December 5, 2012
|
|
 |
NPR, November 25, 2012
|
|
 |
Reader, November 20, 2012
|
|
 |
WLS 890AM, November 15, 2012
|
|
 |
WBEZ, November 15, 2012
|
|
 |
Reader, November 15, 2012
|
|
 |
Chicago Sun-Times, November 15, 2012
|
|
 |
Chicagoist, November 15, 2012
|
|
 |
Chicago Tribune, November 15, 2012
|
|
 |
Architectural Record, November 14, 2012
|
|
 |
The Daily Northwestern, November 14, 2012
|
|
 |
Reader, November 13, 2012
|
|
 |
Chicagoist, November 2, 2012
|
|
 |
Chicago Tribune, November 2, 2012
|
|
 |
Chicago Sun-Times, November 1, 2012
|
|
 |
Skyline, November 1, 2012
|
|
 |
DNAinfo.com Chicago, November 1, 2012
|
|
 |
WTTW Chicago Tonight, October 24, 2012
|
|
 |
Crain’s Chicago Business, October 18, 2012
|
|
 |
Lee Bey WBEZ, October 19, 2012
|
|
 |
Chicago Sun-Times, October 18, 2012
|
|
 |
Chicago Tribune, October 18, 2012
|
|
 |
Architect’s Newspaper, October 17, 2012
|
|
 |
Chicagoist, October 17, 2012
|
|
 |
New York Times, October 17, 2012
|
|
 |
ArchitectureChicago Plus, October 16, 2012
|
|
 |
Chicago Tribune, September 30, 2012
|
|
 |
Chicago Sun-Times, September 27, 2012
|
|
 |
Chicago Tribune, September 16, 2012
|
|
 |
WGN News, September 24, 2012
|
|
 |
WBEZ, September 21, 2012
|
|
 |
Reader, September 10, 2012
|
|
 |
Chicago Tribune, September 7, 2012
|
|
 |
Time Out Chicago, September 5, 2012
|
|
 |
Blouin Artinfo, September 5, 2012
|
|
 |
Engineering News Record, September 5
|
|
 |
Architect’s Newspaper, September 4, 2012
|
|
 |
Chicago Sun-Times, September 4, 2012
|
|
 |
Chicago Tribune, September 4, 2012
|
|
 |
Reader, August 31, 2012
|
|
 |
ArchitectureChicago Plus, August 30, 2012
|
|
 |
Crain's Chicago Business, August 27, 2012
|
|
 |
Chicago Tribune, August 24, 2012
|
|
 |
Chicago Tribune, August 22, 2012
|
|
 |
Chicago Sun-Times, August 22, 2012
|
|
 |
Chicago Magazine, August 22, 2012
|
|
 |
Reader, August 22, 2012
|
|
 |
ArchitectureChicago Plus, August 21, 2012
|
|
 |
ArchitectureChicago Plus, August 17, 2012
|
|
 |
Crain’s Chicago Business, August 15, 2012
|
|
 |
Reader, August 15, 2012
|
|
 |
Vanity Fair, August 14, 2012
|
|
 |
Chicago Tribune, August 12, 2012
|
|
 |
WTTW Chicago Tonight, August 7, 2012
|
|
 |
Architect, August 6, 2012
|
|
 |
Crain’s Chicago Business, August 6, 2012
|
|
 |
Architect, August 5, 2012
|
|
 |
New York Times, August 3, 2012
|
|
 |
Skyline, August 2, 2012
|
|
 |
Chicago
Tribune, Cityscapes, August 2, 2012
|
|
 |
ArchitectureChicago Plus blog, August 2, 2012 |
|
 |
Chicago
Tribune, July 29, 2012 |
|
 |
Chicago
Sun-Times, July 29, 2012
|
|
 |
Time Tells, July 27, 2012
|
|
 |
Chicago Sun-Times, July 27, 2012
|
|
 |
WTTW Chicago Tonight, July 26, 2012
|
|
 |
Chicago
Tribune, July 26, 2012
|
|
 |
A|N Blog, July 26, 2012 |
|
 |
WBEZ, July 26, 2012 |
|
 |
TimeOut
Chicago, July 26, 2012 |
|
 |
ArchitectureChicago PLUS, April 24, 2012 |
|
 |
Chicago Sun-Times, April 24, 2012 |
|
 |
CBS Chicago, April 24, 2012 |
|
 |
Crain's Chicago Business, April 24, 2012 |
|
 |
ABC7 Chicago, April 24, 2012 |
|
 |
FOX Chicago News, April 24, 2012 |
|
 |
Chicago Tribune, April 24, 2012 |
|
 |
Lee Bey WBEZ, April 24, 2012 |
|
 |
Architect, August 8, 2011 |
|
 |
Healthcare Communication News, July 26, 2011 |
|
 |
Sun-Times, June 29, 2011 |
|
 |
Chicago Sun-Times, May 29, 2011 |
|
 |
Chicago Tribune, May 25, 2011 |
|
 |
The Chicago Architecture Blog, May 25, 2011 |
|
 |
Hello Beautiful, May 16, 2011 |
|
 |
Architect’s Newspaper, April 20, 2011 |
|
 |
New York Times, April 16, 2011
|
|
 |
Skyline, April 13, 2011 |
|
 |
Chicago Tribune, April 4, 2011 |
|
 |
Chicago Tribune, March 26, 2011 |
|
 |
Curbed Chicago, March 14, 2011 |
|
 |
Architect’s Newspaper, March 3, 2011 |
|
|